www.CatholicLiberty.com

Relativism’s Moral Mission


R.R. RENO

Source:
First Things
Type:
Media/Opinion
Date:
4/1/2012

Go to this article

Want to understand the Catholic faith?

ABSTRACTArticle | First Things Home Visit the Home Page Print Edition Current Edition Previous Edition Archive Subscribe On the Square Latest Feature Archive Blogs Evangel Secondhand Smoke First Thoughts Postmodern Conservative Events Coming Events Recent Events Advertising Advertise on First Things Donate Support First Things About Us Masthead ROFTERS Contact Us Submissions Store Shop First Things Affiliate Books Subscribe Subscribe Customer Service Search First Things 2012 January February March April 2011 January February March April May June/July October November Aug/Sept December 2010 January February March April May June/July Aug/Sept October November December 2009 January February March April May June/July Aug/Sept October November December 2008 January February March April May June/July Aug/Sept October November December 2007 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 2006 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 2005 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 2004 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 2003 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 2002 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 2001 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 2000 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 1999 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 1998 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 1997 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 1996 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 1995 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 1994 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 1993 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 1992 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 1991 January February March April May June/July August/September October November December 1990 March April May June/July August/September October November December April 2012 Relativism’s Moral Mission The Public Square R.R. Reno In The Brothers Karamazov , the rationalist and unbelieving Ivan is visited by the devil, who lays out the moral consequences of atheism. After belief in God is extinguished, �man will be exalted with the spirit of divine, titanic pride, and the man-god will appear.� Of course few will have the courage of the �man-god� to live in an entirely secular world. Ivan has the courage to face the fact that God is dead, or so the devil seductively suggests. And thus for him, �everything is permitted.� I used to think that Dostoevsky was echoing a long tradition of anxious concern about atheism, one that presumes that without religious belief people will descend into a nihilistic state of self-regard and the moral order of society will crumble. This has not come to pass, at least not yet. Secular Sweden remains well-ordered. New York City, where many people don�t believe in God, is run by a neo-Puritan mayor who crusades against cigarettes and soft drinks. Today�s unbelievers have rules, plenty of them. Dostoevsky, it would seem, was wrong. Or not. When the devil tells Ivan that �everything is permitted,� he was not suggesting that without God there are no rules. Instead, �everything is permitted� means that nothing is always wrong. Everything is, at least at some point and under some circumstances, permitted. I should have seen this earlier. After all, Ivan is the moralistic brother, not the hedonistic one. (Dmitri plays that role.) Moreover, the devil urges Ivan to assume the role of the new supreme rule maker, not that of an impulsive rule breaker. It was a recent and ongoing debate on the electronic pages of Public Discourse that clarified Dostoevsky�s concerns for me. The debate has focused on moral absolutes, the prohibitions that admit of no exceptions, things that are never permitted. The principle that one should not directly intend to kill an innocent person provides a prime example. There are never situations or circumstances in which one can justifiably kill the innocent. Christopher Tollefson and Robert T. Miller argue that there are natural or non-theological reasons�reasons that don�t require beliefs about God�to believe in moral absolutes, and that�s enough to give them force. One doesn�t do what one knows to be wrong, because it�s sufficient to know that it�s wrong. Matthew O�Brien allows that there may be natura.......