UK: Students block union’s attempt to stifle free speech on abortion


Catholic Herald UK

Go to this article

Want to understand the Catholic faith?

ABSTRACT Students block union’s attempt to stifle free speech on abortion | CatholicHerald.co.uk Wed 4th Apr 2012 | Last updated: Wed 4th Apr 2012 at 17:06pm Home Latest News Features Comment & Blogs Multimedia Catholic Life Spiritual Life Saint of the week The week ahead The word this week Advertising Subscriptions Hot Topics Pope Benedict XVI Papal Visit 2010 Archbishop Vincent Nichols Personal Ordinariate general audience Latest News Students block union’s attempt to stifle free speech on abortion By Simon Caldwell on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 In This Article abortion , pro-life , UCL Catholic Society , University College London Share Share | Related Posts Top barrister: students’ crackdown on abortion debate is Stalinist and illegal After the drama of Bedford Square, the pro-life movement faces one enormous challenge For a moment people have stopped talking about a ‘clump of cells’ and are beginning to see an unborn child Student union restricts talks on abortion Torchlight walkers seek repeal University College London (PA photo) A student rebellion has crushed an attempt to ban free discussion of abortion at a leading British university. The National Union of Students at the University College London abandoned its plans to impose pro-abortion speakers on students’ groups if they ever tried to arrange a talk by a speaker critical of terminations. The climbdown was forced by a coalition of students who objected to what they considered to be an attack on free speech. Union trustees accepted advice from their own lawyers that the students were right to claim that the move to curtail free speech had been “completely illegal”. The students had claimed that the resolution had breached Section 43 of the 1986 Education Act that protects freedom of expression in universities and had threatened the union with a legal challenge. Trustees were also told that proposals to affiliate and donate to the political Abortion Rights campaign were also against the charity laws that govern students’ unions. Their decision to drop the pro-abortion resolutions could have huge repercussions in students’ unions across Britain that already give money to Abortion Rights, including those of Oxford, Leeds and Goldsmith College at the University of London. The row erupted after the UCL Catholic Society invited Lord Alton of Liverpool, the former Lib Dem MP, to give a talk about the right to life last October. The students union passed a motion stating: “Any future open events focusing on the issue of termination invite an anti-choice speaker and a pro-choice speaker as well as an independent chair, to ensure there is a balance to the argument.” Cajetan Skowronski, the incoming president of the Catholic Society, said that afterwards “students from all kinds of backgrounds approached us and said ‘if you want to challenge this we will support you because it’s ridiculous that a union is trying to impose one opinion on us, especially at a university”. “We had support from people who were pro-choice as well as those who were pro-life,” he said. Catholic, Jewish and Sikh students later informed the union in a joint letter that they would not abide by the resolution. Students then initiated legal action against the union which resulted in a meeting of the trustees who threw out the resolutions. Mr Skrowronski, who attended the meeting, said the trustees took the simple view that “if it’s illegal we can’t do it and if it’s impractical we can’t do it”. Neil Addison, the director of the Thomas More Legal Centre who advised the students, said: “I am delighted with this result which is due to the courage of pro-life students refusing to be intimidated. “I find it worrying that a students’ union should be so ignorant of the concept of free speech and demonstrate such a totalitarian and intolerant mindset,” he said. “Pro-abortionists are increasingly trying to prevent the pro life message being heard and to close down debate on the subject of abortion,” Mr Addison added. “That will not be allowed to happen.” ← Older Comments Guest 1. You are a hideously bigoted person. 2. We should stop listening to rationalism? Guest Can you really not see a problem in giving a man control over a woman’s body? And I can honestly say I’ve never burnt a bra. Guest There’s no such thing as a ‘good’ or ‘bad’ reason for terminating a pregnancy. It’s the individual’s choice. Everyone has their own reasons – who are we to judge them? James Well, if you don’t like pregnancy then don’t have sex. End of story…. So, you are in favour of killing innocent babies in their mother’s womb.. That is sick and twisted. Cjkeeffe You have failed to provide any answer to question I raised previously about the medical and psycological impact of abortion on a woman – why is that? A previous poster frefered commentators to the marthasvinyard website detailing some of thes.......